Project Risk Assessment and Decision Support Tools

Search Timer

Quality Audit Follow-up pg 3

157- Is personal protective equipment (PPE): (Yes = green)

  1. Being worn properly?
  2. Not being worn where it could contaminate other areas?
  3. Being changed timely after being used?

158- Are key people qualified to run a project of this type and complexity? (No = red)

159- Does PM/QA report test results as it is supposed to? (Yes = green)

160- Does QA run its procedures through a verification process to ensure accurate results? (Yes = good)

161- Does SM/PM make regular visits to the test lab? (No = blue)

162- Have/does the roster of personnel listed on paper (both in-house staffers and outside consultants) on the roster actually do work for/on the project? (No = red)

163- Do vendors provide key information about its operation, when the firms request it? (No = red)

164- If climate control is required as part of the testing procedure, does QA/PM ensure that tests are conducted according to specifications? (Yes = good)

165- Do consequences for departing from procedures, poor performance, include loss/suspension of permit/license, safety stand-downs, dismissal etc.? (Yes = good)

166- Is research conducted based on inspection reports? Complaints? Interviews? Interviews with former employees? (Yes = good)

167- Are material/equipment expiration dates closely monitored? (Yes = good)

168- Have all test equipment assigned to the lab been located and maintained? (Yes = good)

169- Are test materials verified for correctness and accuracy? (Yes = good)

170- Are/were field tests fabricated (manipulated)? (Yes = bad)

171- Are failures greater than 50%? (Yes = red)

172- Have test reports been requested and received? (Yes = good)

173- Are test samples/results properly custodied to prevent tampering/manipulation? (Yes = green)