Project Risk Assessment and Decision Support Tools

Search Timer

WITHDRAWAL STRATEGIES (INDIVIDUALLY OR IN COMBINATION – Part 2 of 3)

  • Subdivide existing project into several smaller projects.
  • Reduce the number of projects.
  • Claim project as an investment for the future.
  • Don’t pay vendors.
  • Approve budget for R&D only and don’t fund procurement activities.
  • Make project management take a salary cut if performance doesn’t meet expectations.
  • Replace project manager.
  • Remove perks from project team.
  • Slow approval process/ add additional testing hurdles, frequent milestones, or more formal methods as go/no-go points.
  • Reduce or eliminate travel budget.
  • Cut payments to contractors by a (TBD) %.
  • Go to a lower technical solution.
  • Look for different applications/ways that the product could be used.
  • Temporarily freeze the project’s funds.
  • Build a little – test a little – incrementally implement project.
  • Remove the project from the limelight.
  • Select a less expensive/ ambitious or small option or technology.
  • Devise a temporary solution until a more lasting decision is made.
  • If it can not make the desired profit, delay launching the product until the technology is developed (Note: delay forces more drastic remedies).
  • If project won’t eliminate enough technical risk to justify spending more money, delay delivery of final system.
  • Return to original system.
  • Remove (take away) financial control from the project manager.
  • Announce a delayed withdrawal date.
  • Block, withhold, slow, suspend, or cut funding.
  • Have project reviewed by an independent body.
  • Designate the contractor as high risk and avoid future business dealings with him/her; suspend/fine or issue contractor an ultimatum.
  • Isolate/insulate project from the decision making process.
  • Refuse to accept the final product from the contractor, until critical problems are resolved.
  • Withdraw/delay if insufficient raw materials/resources are not available to make the project economically viable.
  • Allow a non-politically involved 3rd party to manage the project.
  • Restrict overtime expenses.
  • Terminate the contract.
  • Reduce the head count on the project.
  • Enter into a limited alliance with a more capable firm.
  • Scale back the project’s size if $’s are reduced.
  • Threaten to withdraw unless:
  • More resources are committed
  • You are paid a certain percentage of the fee
  • New/better controls are put in place, including a deadline