Project Risk Assessment and Decision Support Tools

Search Timer

WITHDRAWAL STRATEGIES (INDIVIDUALLY OR IN COMBINATION – Part 1 of 3)

  • A project may be salvageable with modifications. Some of the ways are listed below:
  • Never initiate the proposed project.
  • Orderly planned termination.
  • The “hatchet” – a rapid withdrawal of funds, removal of resources, or other resources permanently or until desired conditions are met.
  • Reassignment of people/resources to higher priority/more profitable projects.
  • Outsource costly functions to lower cost geographic areas (either regionally or globally).
  • Redirect efforts toward different objectives (i.e., closer realignment with core competencies), with proper approval.
  • Burying it or letting it die on the vine (i.e., not taking any official action allowing the resources to exhaust themselves).
  • Reduce the requirements that the end product must meet.
  • Deny that the problem situation exists and avoid deploying resources to address it.
  • Invest funding/resources to correctly complete the project.
  • Pressure key suppliers/business partners to share in some of the losses.
  • De/Re-scoping/reduce the project deliverables to a more appropriate level. Pick areas where there is still a possibility of success, (and support), and pursue them.
    1. For instance:

      1. Reduce the number of options. *Simplify the design.
      2. Sell project/product to a niche group (if profitable).
      3. Produce less of the final product.
      4. Re-bid the contract(s).
      5. Break existing project into many smaller projects.
      • Defer/delay/postpone/place project on hold until another time.
      • Await other favorable events, results of more testing to prove the soundness of the technology, decision making greater compliance, better market conditions, resolution of a legal matter, more systems/resources, additional upgrades are completed.
      • Rethink, possibly returning to the feasibility study phase or a phase earlier than the current phase/ assess any unusual/ unforeseen variables.
      • Refer the problem for independent review by either an expert or an informed committee to make go/no-go recommendations.
      • Withhold funds pending receipt of a better business plan.
      • As required, make a comprehensive review of the entire process (e.g., supply chain, assembly process, engineering, manufacturing, quality assurance)
      • Hire a contractor/partner with a firm/spin-off/acquire a firm with experience to complete the job at the scale and speed required.
      • Take legal action to terminate the project.
      • Buy a completely tested product or system instead of building one.
      • Assign project to a new project manager or bring in new management.
      • Declare that the project was only a “pilot” which was (is) established to determine the feasibility of proceeding further (at some specified/unspecified time in the future).
      • Spin-off the project to allow for more rapid development/market exploitation.
      • Recall the product.
      • Delay testing of the product.
      • Appoint a task force/ committee, preferably of experts, to make go/no-go recommendations.
      • Investigate how contractor got the contract.
      • Rethink/Restructure/Reshape/Scale Back/Retool process.